HomeAround the WebPartnersDownloadsConversantsReadingsIntroductionHome

Displaying results 1 - 10 of 190 matches (0.01 seconds)
1. [100.00%] Newswire Analysis: Google Scholar’s Ghost Authors, Lost Aut...
algorithms create phantom authors for millions of papers. They derive false names from options listed on the search menu, such as P Login (for Please Login). Very often, the real authors are relegated to ghost authors deprived of their
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6698580.html - 105.7kb

2. [31.67%] The Future of Reading - 11/1/2009 - Library Journal
The future of reading is very much in doubt. In this century, reading could soar to new heights or crash and burn. Some educators and librarians fear that sustained reading for learning, for work, and for pleasure may be slowly dying out as a
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6703852.html - 113.9kb

3. [24.34%] Library Groups Ask Justice Department To Supervise Institutional Pricing fo...
representation of academic authors on the Registry board, even though academic authors wrote the vast majority of the books Google will include in its database, and those authors—unlike those in the authors Guild-—"probably would
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6712243.html - 90.8kb

4. [24.34%] UC Academics Raise Major Concerns About Google Settlement - 8/20/2009 ...
to knowledge, while academic authors would have reversed those priorities,” the faculty members wrote. “We note that the scholarly books written by academic authors constitute a much more substantial part of the Book Search corpus than
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6678948.html - 95.3kb

5. [21.70%] Participatory Networks The Library as
are reviewed. Finally, the authors recommend the creation of a shared participatory test bed for libraries. This network would not only experiment with new collaborative Web technologies, but also work with library organizations and vendors to
http://quartz.syr.edu/rdlankes/ParticiaptoryNetworks.pdf - 2,053.8kb

6. [17.60%] Conversants
for ongoing public review. Authors are encouraged to follow these conversations, and can incorporate these comments into revised drafts. Unlike most journals, accepted pieces are published as they are accepted: encouraging timely discussions of
http://ptbed.org/conversants.php - 4.6kb

7. [12.61%] Participatory networks: the library as conversation
Conclusion . The authors recommend the creation of a shared participatory test bed for libraries. This network would not only experiment with new collaborative Web technologies, but also work with library organizations and vendors to
http://InformationR.net/ir/12-4/colis/colis05.html - 48.4kb

8. [12.61%] http://www.DavidLankes.org TITLE: The
on the words used by the authors of the page. Due to the commercial nature of these tools, many Web authors use Search Engine Optimization (SEO) techniques to push their pages to the top of listings 5. If these two issues are combined ­ search
http://quartz.syr.edu/rdlankes/Publications/Journals/drewfinal.pdf - 312.9kb

9. [12.02%] Revised Google Settlement Offers Minor Changes on Antitrust Issue, No Respo...
has equal representation of authors and publishers, was expanded to include authors and publishers from the Anglophone countries of Canada, the United Kingdom, and Australia Criticism lodged Peter Brantley, co-chair of the Open Book Alliance
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6707181.html - 93.6kb

10. [10.85%] http://www.DavidLankes.org TITLE:
are reviewed. Finally, the authors recommend the creation of a shared participatory test bed for libraries. This network would not only experiment with new collaborative Web technologies, but also work with library organizations and vendors to
http://quartz.syr.edu/rdlankes/Publications/Journals/COLISFinal-v7.pdf - 974.1kb

Result page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Powered by Sphider